FreESPiRIT92264

 This FB page that is by invitation only, has been created to allow communication between all Esprit residents for all kinds of purposes: Exchange any ideas to improve the community Buy or sell any items Alert others of any event of common interest

  Join Zoom Meeting https://us02web.zoom.us/j/85287998905 Meeting ID: 852 8799 8905 One tap mobile +16699009128,,85287998905# US Our email is julia92262@gmail.com More information can be found on the following blogspot FreESPiRIT92264 Thank you for forwarding this message to your clients for review.

 Esprit Attorney letters - HOA legal counsel BRIAN MORENO Esq . and other emails (copy and paste the link into your browser to read the files) Please connect with me through Facebook, so that I can invite you to my "Friends of Esprit" private Group My Facebook picture https://drive.google.com/file/d/1FVQUqxJzFChJBt_nZUq_Hap43PH0WtQE/view?usp=sharing ======================= Violation hearing notice https://drive.google.com/file/d/1h1n__WUES4hr9B5KcHekYK9MPj6DxHs_/view?usp=sharing =================== Brian Moreno Letter after the Hearing on 9/28/22 https://drive.google.com/file/d/1lK1Eak7yHiQwL5qAl6nOIlT5HMnyTACk/view?usp=sharing ============ Our Emails asking for gate code programming... for 60+ days https://drive.google.com/file/d/1QMt4BZsj0T7Yq91XwfqtL7lgbNaQ9jRe/view?usp=sharing ============ Letter written to Mrs. Bleier Esprit President by Julia Sebestyen on August 7, 2022 https://drive.google.com/file/d/1mhwyc7HDirRUsaeT7n9rZJWuI_WOC-Ji/view?usp=sharing =================

  CHAIN OF EVENTS  JUNE 2, 2021 - 10/10/2022  The history of $13,500 legal fees spent by the Esprit Board Dear Fellow Esprit Owners. There is a chance that we may be subjected to an approximately $112-560 special assessment by the HOA to repay non-budgeted legal fees unnecessarily spent by the Board recently. The Board requested that my husband and I reimburse the HOA $13,500 that the Board spent to pay an attorney to “deal with us”. Here is the timeline and chain of events that began after April 2021 when we purchased unit #79. Our tenant's car was towed on July 2, 2021 with a notice stating“NO TAGS”. The car was displaying a blue tag with ESPRIT #XXXX on it. We disputed the towing with the HOA asserting that we were not provided with the proper parking RULES listing the current requirements of RED and GREEN parking tag colors and their application, during escrow or after closing. The parking tag requirements are still not posted on the bulletin boards nor con

This is NOT Esprit HOA communication... if you had any doubt... Please read the attorney's 10.22.2021 letter by following this link, then our response below.  https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Z4XGbDvQeQSp2HM-rwRUOmkJhBpK4C9bpqJ7pNCp3p0/edit?usp=sharing Dear Mr. Moreno, Please read our responses to your questions below, inline, in bold italics: 1. Your failure to provide all of the signatures of owners supporting the recall petition is another misrepresentation of facts and an attempt to mislead the Association about those who made such a submission. As such, the Association demands that you produce all signatures as required by law.  All signatories to the recall petition were provided to the board at the same time that the petition was submitted.  2. You promised to stop using the esprit92264 gmail address to communicate between owners; however, you misrepresented such facts, as you continue to use said e-mail despite your promises not to. We have created a new email,   freespi

The case wasn't even ours to begin with... This morning,  October 21, 2021, before the 11 am Townhall meeting regarding the land lease extension, there was a hearing in the Indio Court department 3M that could be attended by anyone virtually. Our HOA sent its attorney to get $10,000 or so legal fees spent to defend a board member, Mr. Cannon in what we consider a private lawsuit. Mr. Barnett had no chance to speak at this hearing as the judge stopped the attorney's attempts to claim the legal fees. Upon hearing the case we were wondering what this LA attorney may have been feeding the board? His statements went against what the judge remembered about the case being dismissed without any objections, due to the fact that the board member who the restraining order was originally filed against was selling his condo. While executive meetings are not open, we are not aware that there had been a properly noticed meeting, nor have we read any disclosures made in the regular meeting min